Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Wrong track of development! Where are the coaster improvements which make the game playable?!?

  1. #1

    Thumbs up Wrong track of development! Where are the coaster improvements which make the game playable?!?


    I now that this is a kind of double-post, but I believe my original post in the bug tracker is not enough. So here you can find my personal list of problems and questions mainly pointing on rollercoasters, hoping to get an answer soon? Otherwise, I would have to open 30 bug threads. I believe that is not what you want. ;-).

    • Although the coaster physics are “improved” with the last update, they are still not realistic (for a game). There is far too much friction on certain points, especially on steel coasters. The option “grease tracks” results in a total unrealistic behavior. I have never seen a coaster which needs so many additional chain lifts and boosters, and on the other hand brakes because the ride intensity is far too much and leads to nausea. I am pretty sure that I am able to build a certain “quality” of coasters with realistic elements, drops, sizes, curves and inversions, but the result in the game is not nearly logical. One time the coaster is far too fast, then again to slow, and as a result it is not possible to build a coaster without boosters and brakes in positions where they would NEVER be needed normally. This also has an impact on the statistics which are not logical also.
    • The ride statistics are very frustrating. All self-made coasters lead (except of “baby coasters”) to very bad test results with excitement of “medium” or “low”, while intensity and nausea rates are “extreme” or “mega-extreme”. The result is, that no one of the peeps wants to ride the coaster or they say “I don`t pay … for …” (caused by the low excitement, which would definitely be much higher if the physics were correct or the statistic computing would be better).
    • Even the pre-defined coasters show that there are huge problems with coaster physics: There are boosters, brakes, chain lifts at many unwanted points – this is a clear evidence, that even the “professional builders” are not able to build up a coaster without any problems, the statistics are also very, very sad
    • Why is it not possible to perform a continuous test while building a coaster like it was in earlier versions (the “white painted coaster with an endless loop”)?
    • Why do I have to start the game to test the coaster? Far too much realism at a totally unwanted point! (realistic behavior is good, yes, but please hit the best points instead of stepping on my nerves)
    • I cannot build several inversions like a dive loop because that leads to extreme intensity and nausea, even if the speed is adequate. This happens especially in pre-defined elements. A very good example is the floorless coaster and an Immelmann or dive loop. In the test view, the track is colored in deep reed (and green) especially on the exit of these elements. Yes, there are G-forces, I know, but the statistics are rising to “extreme” and “mega-extreme” even when this track would normally have a maximum count of “very high”. This is very frustrating as in fact it is not possible to build a good realistic coaster with the level “high” or “very high” while holding nausea in “medium” range.
    • There are still pre-defined elements with a multiple wrong inverted track on the exit, eg. a big loop left or sometimes a hammerhead turn
    • Some pre-defined items (inversions or special coaster elements as well as some decoration and so on) are titled in alpha-numerical codes with “_” instead of (English, my native language is German) a description
    • The block braking system does not work correctly; it performs a full stop of the train even when the following track is free
    • The train/car selection system is probably well meant, but why is there no simple option like a drop-down menu? This is very frustrating!
    • Why are there only different colors available for the hyper coaster, not different cars? It is the same thing with other variants of coasters.
    • Why is it not possible to determine the length of the station?
    • Track height and length is displayed in “minutes”
    • It is not possible to switch to a height-displaying view while building coasters as it was in older versions.
    • When building coasters with the menu buttons, not the freehand-method, there are only 45 and 90 degree curves available, a “mid-size” button is missing
    • When building coasters free-hand, the automatic selection of the curve adjustment when hitting the track is very frustrating! Normally, I do not want to add a sharp maneuver, I want to adjust!
    • The white add-track needle makes no sense when there is a very twisted track added instead of a straight one
    • When I add banking to the track, the transfer from the straight track to the banked one is far too short resulting in sharp maneuvers which are not realistic
    • The maximum combination with banked drops is to less, especially when using the wooden coaster. Real wooden coasters support much more banking in curved drops.
    • The spinning coaster does not SPIN!!! Also, there is no switch to make decide if this is a spinning track or not
    • Why is there only one manufacturer-track layout per type of coaster? I see B&M style track in every case (where is Vekoma?), only a different layout for the not spinning spinning coaster and an Intamin-like layout for the accelerator coaster?
    • Where are the several types of coasters which are existing in the reality and already brought to game customers in earlier versions of RCT? Will there be more coasters available throughout the near future?
    • Same direction, but not a coaster: Where are the different types of free-fall towers? Why is it not possible to define the height? Why is it not possible to switch the mode between free-fall and a type of launch to the top?
    • On all flat rides: The speed is defined with 360 min? What is that?


    • The new sound features are overkill! You always hear noise from other trains and even different coasters nearby when you are on a coaster ride cam. The sound is not corresponding with what happens on the screen!
    • Brake sounds and screaming do not fit!
    • Sometimes the sound breaks off completely

    This list is only the beginning. The game is named “Roller Coaster Tycoon”. Why, dear developers, do you focus on shadows, faces and water instead of building a good COASTER builder, a good coaster selection, good physics and everything I listed before? Shadows are nice, yes, and they have to be in the final game, but please make your basics before starting with “decoration”.

    I have the feeling that you are on the wrong track at the moment. So, can you answer to this simple question:

    When do you plan to develop the coaster part of a coaster named theme park simulation with a clear focus on this?

    Thanks in advance and sorry, but I am a bit frustrated.



  2. #2
    Passive Peep
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Same here...

    In RCT3 I was able to build realistic, high exitement rated coasters with only one lifthill and a break at the end. Most of them run through the track even without testing it before!

    This game doesn't support those realistic coasters.

    You should overhaul the physics first and...

    - allow post built track adjustments (curves and other) in a much larger way. Maybe by selecting more nodes
    - allow testing while building
    - allow auto delete of obstacles
    - allow to change entrance/exit positions (all rides!)
    - allow to change node rotation with mouse wheel instead of 1, 2, 3 keys
    - change booster and break forces to wanted speeds
    - change units in german version
    - change station queue lines to fit to the number of cars/trains
    - allow peeps to wait in station queue lines
    - allow to adjust the lauch of the lauch coaster
    - allow deleting supports
    - change track banking units to 180° or 360° max.

    I don't know more right now, but it's already a lot to fix...

  3. #3
    Maybe I'm alone in this, but I really like the fixed entrance and exits.

  4. #4
    Passive Peep
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    I don't mind them for the most part. Except! When they are on opposite sides of the ride!
    I would be perfectly fine if they were ALL on one side, and separated by one grid square.

  5. #5
    I'm perfectly fine with the fixed entrances and exits, except when they're in a really bad place and I want to move them. We should have that option after the ride is placed at least. I think in RCT3 you had to pick where you wanted them but they didn't have a default location. For the most part, they're good enough. Also, we should be able to place the ride where we want it and if the entrances/exits collide with paths or other structures, they should automatically be omitted and just be able to place them afterwards where they're most convenient. Placing the ride, moving the entrance/exit and then moving the ride to where you want it later would just be an extra cost.

  6. #6
    Speed Seeker The Stig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    I'm indifferent. I really don't mind it as much as I thought I would. But if they can change it, that would be cool.

  7. #7
    I have to agree with honestlyawesome about creating exciting steel coasters. I've tried all manner of things (lower/higher drops, more/less speed), often to no avail in that none of the stats change. In RCT3, if you created Very High excitement coaster, you know the peeps would ride.

    I have managed to create a wooden coaster with an excitement rating of 6.00 which goes up to 8.00 when scenery is added, but I have yet to create any steel coaster higher than 3.00. If the peeps can't handle the pre-made parts (loops etc), why put them in?

    I'm hoping that future updates will address this issue as a matter of urgency as this is a major component of the game and a reason to keep coming back to it.

  8. #8
    I'm definitely the opposite. All of my steel coasters start with base excitements of like 5-6. Scenery makes it higher. The intensity is always about 6-8 and nausea is usually low.

  9. #9
    I agree with biasedcarrot after the physics update I found it a lot easier to make acceptable steel (hyper) coasters
    Still struggle with inverted and launched but had problems with them in the previous games too

  10. #10
    I'm still having problems building coasters. There hasn't been any new updates to address it and it's super frustrating.
    Hopefully, it will happen soon.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Angles are wrong when twisting track
    By Green in forum Early Access Bug Tracker
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-16-2016, 08:47 AM
  2. Make the coaster track/rails realistic!
    By tycooney in forum Early Access Improvement Tracker
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-08-2016, 11:10 PM
  3. Should the game have coaster cars fly off mid-track?
    By Millionaire2K in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 90
    Last Post: 09-20-2015, 05:55 AM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-11-2015, 11:10 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
About us
RollerCoaster Tycoon is back! RCTW is the first new entry to the RollerCoaster Tycoon franchise in a decade, bringing an innovative new track builder, and much more.
Join us